2006 James Bauhaus

HOT HEAD COP 'CURED'

Over six years ago an Osage County, OK deputy got caught torturing a shackled woman in the privacy of the cops' parking lot. Ordinarily cops get completely away with beating people that they've abducted. No one was looking, apparently, and it was probably dark, so the nice cop yanked her out by her hair and slammed her face-first into a concrete wall. The newspaper account (Ex-deputy sentenced in use of Force, 5-3-06 by david.harper@tulsaworld .com) conceals the fact that she was shackled with her hands behind her back and yanked out by her hair. The news-artist even conceals the victim's identity, so there is no way to obtain the facts from the other side.

Though we are forced by selective reporting to use probabilities instead of some facts, I've personally been tortured by personnel at this jail, so I have a very good idea of how they usually do it. (See: Real Life Stupidity on my netsite.)

This particular cop, John Martin Parks, I've never met. But, there is no doubt that in his long career an a cop he has similarly tortured many others. Cops and all other elite, governmental organizations have multiple, overlapping layers of bureaucratic, union, good ole-boy and lawyers' system protections for their employees that we ordinary citizens do not enjoy. (See: Preferential Reporting, ibid.) Hence their crimes are usually kept concealed and dealt with secretly, in-house. This mild, verbal reprimand and probation-type of "punishment" encourages worse behavior. Eventually, when it becomes too frequent and too heinous for their cronies to continue to conceal and tolerate, these malefactors are gently thrown to the wolves for "real" (legal) action.

Even here they still get preferential treatment. Note that Parks was able to delay "justice" for six long years before getting his final judicial handslap. The news-artist is very stingy with the facts. We are forced to make logical conclusions as to how Parks finally got prosecuted. Prosecutors mostly refuse to prosecute the uniformed, badged thugs that they use to bring them sensational cases to propel them into higher political office. The un-named woman's injuries were probably a factor. Having an enraged, 250 pound, out-of-control, belligerent cop slam a shackled, 120 pound girl face-first into a concrete wall with no hands to stop her is bound to necessitate a trip to the hospital. A man or male teenager they would just throw into their cage and let him bleed. (This is what the Tulsa cops did to me when they smashed my nose all over my face after shackling my hands behind my back, taking my glasses, throwing me up against a wall and letting the cop, Bill McDonald suckerpunch me three times. Result:. two black eyes and a broken, bleeding-like-a-faucet nose. Career cops get VERY good at using their police-catalog leather and lead "sap" gloves.) A crying, bleeding lady is a slightly different story: normal people of our culture do not beat woman for any reason. There just isn't any reason for it. Women are small and weak, and even if they hit us, we don't hit back. They can't really hurt us. Women are passive and non-violent. When the cop, Parks, finally dragged his bloody, injured victim into the cops' lair, there was probably a jailer or other person present who still possessed enough humanity to be aghast at seeing the result of "officer" Parks' belligerence and psychopathy. (This is why there needs to be strict, widespread, uncensorable surveillance of everything that goes on inside cops' lairs. Cops tend to lose their humanity quickly, and every corner where they can torture people in private needs to be covered by a camera that feeds to the net where non-cops can readily see it. This will force cops to torture and beat people less frequently, cause fewer prisoners to be found dead or "hung" in the cops' cages, and force cops who insist on torturing people outside where there is a better chance of them being caught at it by citizens who won't help conceal their brutality.)

The aghast parson probably pretended to be indifferent to the lady's suffering until Parks finished his paperwork, coffee, fishing story and got sent out to another crime call. Stone-faced, compassion-free cops affect people this way: their fuck-everybody attitude drains the humanity from everyone that their obscene vibes can reach.

Soon as Parks left, somebody probably called a doctor. (All jails have either a tame doctor on call or at least a policy for obtaining one.) The one for the Pawhuska jail in 1972 was an ancient fellow who could barely see around his cataracts and looked like he'd just come out of a bar ditch after a three-day drunk. He prescribed asprin for the beating the cops had given me. The bleeding lady who'd just gotten squashed between the concrete wall and the bully cop probably got OK'd for a quick trip to the hospital. This led to more people seeing her injuries and gasping at her story. She was probably an ordinary respectable and crime-free citizen too, with a husband, family, children and friends. The "crime" she'd gotten abducted for was probably pretty trivial, too, else the news-artist would have used it to justify the cop's attack.

Even so, nothing was done about this vicious cop for over four years. The standard seem is for the cops to have a spokesliar quietly inform the media that some type of "severe reprimand" will eventually occur. The pronouncement is made in a very solemn voice and the sanction is made to sound as if it qualifies as real punishment. It isn't: the worst thing they ever do is let them resign or fire them. Then they appeal and get their jobs back with perks and pay, or take their pensions over the next political boundary and be vicious cops there.

If the public goes for this, it ends. This one time, it didn't. Somebody, somewhere, somehow kept pushing until finally an anonymous prosecutor put a felony on Parks, apparently for assaulting his victim. That was 10-04. The cop managed to delay until 6-05. Then a federal jury was racked and they could not agree to convict him. A good explanation of how such non-decisions are often created appears in my essay, Juror Groupies, which details the political dynamics few ever see. Probably a single cop-coddler was able to sneak aboard the jury and torpedo justice in spite of the other eleven.

Ordinary criminals, when this happens, get tried and tried again until conviction is had or plea "bargain" is forced. Cops don't get re-tried: the prosecutor, eager to appear to have done his job for the victim, and even more eager to appease the multitudes of cop-coddlers and voters, generally makes placating noises, then moves on.

Usually they get away with it, but not this time. Some anonymous, un-named person(s) kept pushing. Months later, on 3-06, somebody finally filed a misdemeanor of un-described specifics against Parks. The news-artist's garbled, confusing, flashback-ridden account of this does manage to mumble that the new charge was NOT for assault. This means that it was probably some blame-lifting, nonsense-charge that says nothing and masks everything, like "Civil Rights Violation!" (See: The Rise of Lawyerspiel.) These types of charges were invented by lawyers for the purpose of protecting elite, gov't-employed criminals. These special laws create a way for copcrime to become mere "misconduct" or "wrongdoing" instead of what it really is; gov't-sanctioned criminal activity aided and abetted by the gov't itself in order for gov't to maintain its pretense that gov't is infallible. Govt cannot keep criminals out of its ranks. In fact, govt is a magnet for criminals. Criminals are attracted to govt work because of the excess power they can enjoy, and govt employment creates criminals within its ranks because excess power corrupts otherwise decent men. So far, govts have been able to conceal their criminal-attracting and criminal-creating problems through use of a multitude of deceits. Most of these deceits operate out of two places; the govt's tame media-propaganda machines, and the legal machinery that makes and interprets lawn. Clever news-artists and cunning lawyers are essential to govts in duping citizens into believing absurd notions such as: criminality that is assisted and enhanced in magnitude by the use of state power should be punished less instead of more than ordinary criminals who do not enjoy excessive govt power; govt criminality is somehow less than street criminality despite its being highly organized, internationally established, highly secretive and results in mass-murder and destruction of lives on a scale reached by no other entity; govt criminality is only petty and inconsequential or somehow for the greater good, so it is best to let govt conceal its criminality and deal with it quietly in its own way because govt needs to maintain its illusion of competency and wholesomeness, else dreaded anarchy will result; if our good govt falls, however corrupt, we will be attacked and absorbed by rabid foreign govts.

For these and other reasons, Parks and his vicious, arrogant fellows in govt will always escape real punishment for their crimes, no matter how long they've been enabled by govt to practice criminality, and no matter the magnitude of their crimes. More proof of this occurred 3-7-06 when Parks dodged the misdemeanor trial and was given an excellent plea "bargain" that cost him almost nothing and very little bad publicity. He must pay a mere $65 in "penalties" (in contrast, the lowest average traffic ticket Parks wrote during his long career was about $50). He must undergo an unspecified amount of "anger management" counseling, (Such programs are mostly farcical in nature even for non-elite criminals: the worst examples of many that I can cite involve a couple of friends who came to my home and wanted me to sign a paper that said we had an alcoholics anonymous meeting while we visited. Another friend detailed how easy it was to show up for community service obligations and "work" off his hours at about a five to one ratio. Additionally, prison- and faith-based criminal programs paid for and assigned by govt and bureaucrats are an extreme waste of time end money because they usually degenerate into bullshit sessions and Bible study. (I once had to pull the plug on one because I refused to be forced to listen to the idiotic ravings of young-punk neonazis and Negroes on Hitler and WWII. ) As worthless as govt programs for non-elite criminals are, I can easily imagine elite-criminal anger management sessions degenerating into workshops on how to more effectively abuse victims with even less chance of getting caught.

Parks also must endure two years of (GASP!) probation. (If you'll look, you'll find that suspended sentences, probation and deferred sentences seem to be standard for govecrooks.) This means that after two years of non-punishment he will be restored to square one as if nothing has happened. The news-artist did mention that if Parks did manage to get his probation revoked, he may face a single "year" in "prison". (Non-elite criminals have to serve all their probation period in prison.) Cops are often let to "serve" weekends in "jail", which means hours chatting-up the dispatcher and other personnel rather than actually spending any time in a small, locked cage with nothing to see or read or hear. (Recently in Oklahoma it was advertised that the sex-fiend judge who had gotten caught using an autosuck to masterbate during trials had to spend one night in jail. This turned out to be a lie in principle; Judge Thompson got to spend his night in "jail" in an unlocked trustee tank that had had the regular prisoners removed. This privileged "prisoner" had the run of the trustee tank, the trustee kitchen and the jailer's quarters.)

Lastly, Parks is told to stop using his state-issued cop certificate for an unspecified amount of time. This, I think, may mean real economic punishment because we presume that Parks can't earn the extremely lucrative cop-wages without risking a probation violation. Nobody will be checking, and he is still cleet-certified; he just can't flash his cop certificate at potential employers as reason to command the huge cop-bucks. No doubt he can still, like construction labor, work under someone else's cop-certificate as a cop for reduced pay.

The best part of Parks' "punishment" is concealed in the plea bargain. The lawyers wrote it up in such a way as to blame Parks' victim for her beating! Somehow a shackled, helpless lady's "leaning away" from the cop's attempts to grab her and yank her out, plus her "back-talking" is sufficient excuse for a cop beating her, a six-year-long delay of "justice" and the near non-punishment of her attacker. Obviously there is much good reason why the gov/media alliance suppressed reportage on Parks' criminal journey through the Lawyers' System until 5-3-06. It gives Parks plenty of time to move away while he works on his numerous upcoming, lengthy appeals. My estimation is that Parks' appeals will be just as successful as most other cops' appeals in quietly obtaining a type of bureaucratic exhonoration, reinstatement with back pay, perks and automatic promotions, plus a slate wiped clean so that not even his next employers can tell what kind of vicious, sadistic, explosive and arrogant person they just hired.