JUDGE PAMPERING AND THEIR ILLEGAL JUROR TAMPERING

8-25-99: Today on Pat Robertson's 700-club 'news' was a quote from a named judge with no other qualifiers such as his record and height within the lawcrat hierarchy that stank mightily of Holier-than-thou and Do-what-I-say, not.what-I-do. Judge Greene of Washington, DC had a long, sonorous, self-righteous drone that said, in effect, that jury nullification is juror perjury.

These pampered judges from pampered lineages nauseate all thinking beings when they vomit such offal from the arrowslits of their Ivory Towers. Confined within their taxherd subsidised fortresses of opulent splendor, these wing-eared moss-backs never see life as it is for us non-plutocrats that make up 99% of humanity. This separate species of vermin have delusions of Godhood because their great-grandparents managed to insert themselves into positions of power and wealth the same way a tick inserts itself under a dog's tail. Civilized society has consequently dragged its ass across the ground trying mightily to dislodge them ever since, to the distraction of more important endeavors.

Jury nullification is lawcratspreken for their much-hated nemesis: freethinkers. The opposite of jury nullification is jury indoctrination or jury programing. The process works thus: after the defense lawyer has had his single 'final' argument to the jurors, and after the state's prosecuting lawyer has had both of his 'final' arguments to the jurors, the state's judge has HIS final argument to the jurors, called 'juror in instructions'. The judge's instructions to the jurors always consist of him cornering the jurors with THE LAW which, in his interpretation, always forced them to vote for conviction. In order to further program the 13 carefully preselected yesmen of the jury, judges have long, windy speeches that they always deliver about how sacred and Holy their law is. These pious, solemnly-exhorted exhalations about the sacrament of law generally suffice to stamp out any last vestiges of free will that may yet contaminate the jurors.

"It may not be right, but it's THE LAW!" is a common verse used as both justification by lawcrats and as a plaintive lament of weak-kneed jurors who still possess an uncorrupted sense of justice yet not the moral fibre to force its recognition.

This same, exact lament came from 13 jurors deciding to condemn a teenager for life in prison without parole for merely stealing a single slice of pizza. The judge browbeat them all into slap-happy conviction-mode with pronouncements upon how sacred the law is, even the 3-strikes-you're-out-law-even-if-it's-a-misdemeanor-pizza-slice-stealing-probation-violation.

The hereditary rich lawcrats of just before the French revolution tendered the same logic for decades until finally an altruist ventured this sarcasm: "The law, in its supreme majesty, prohibits the rich as well as the starving from stealing bread". The judge's "Let them eat cake" arrogance eventually cost almost the entire French nobility-class their heads, but not before visiting two centuries of suffering and misery upon millions of producers.

The privileged classes generally degenerate rapidly into decadence, and judge Greene'e prolix on juror nullification is an example of exactly this. Undoubtedly his diatribe results from a jury of freethinkers he or His cronies somehow failed to control. The rhetoric he spews amounts to a tantrum against free will and independent thought. For the record, which is never advertised in any way, least of all any courtroom, no juror has any obligation to follow any recommendation that any judge or prosecutor makes. This fact should be posted directly above the judge himself, and in front of each juror.

Judges become very disturbed when jurors do not do as they are told and parrot the guilt-spiel that the benchcrats pump into them. As early as 1879 a cruel, enraged judge locked up a jury without food or water until they croaked the required guilty vote for him and his prosecutor. Today judges still force jurors back into the judge's windowless box until they realize only the guilty vote is acceptable.

Judge Glower also has his the bailiffs and deputies, to enforce his demands within the jurybox itself: no one is safe from his predations, and especially no one suppressed onto his jury. Pat Robertson plus unspecified judges from the 2nd circuit (NY, VT and CT) all agree with Greene in saying it is perjury when the jurors refuse to "honor its sworn duty to uphold THE LAW: (as interpreted by the robed fossil of the sacred priesthood hiding behind that particular courtroom fortification/high ground/pedestal.)

The one thing a freethinking juror is NOT is perjurous. Judges Greene, Longpipe, Broadass and Flopjowl need only read a bit deeper into their own lawbooks to find that their betters in the legislature have long since passed laws that make jurors immune to perjury and most other laws. Except in Maine, jurors and witnesses can lie all they want and get completely away with it, that is, unless they do it for the defense and against the prosecution. There are loopholes in every law and rule for the gluttons of privilege to dive through. But that's what judges love most about law: their ability to twist, hammer and tear it into whatever shaped tool they require to obtain their goal, which is always conviction in the case of the state attacking its citizens, called "criminal" law.

Judges still use their Godlike power to prevent jurors from leaving as their primary means of squeezing “unanimous” guilty votes from them. This type of forced labor, judge-induced slavery to be exact, occurs daily despite a 1993 supreme court ruling that "rejects" this type of juror-screwing by arrogant judges intent upon forcing their will upon jurors with infantile verbal tantrums and threats of perjury.

Persons who see the utility of a democracy composed of intelligent, freethinking, well informed citizens can spread increased free will among the potential-juror classes by contacting Larry Dodge, founder of the "Fully Informed Jury Association". Likely he has free literature on this subject that judges do not want disseminated.

I wish I could supply an address, net or phone sequence, but I am a victim of judicial juror-programing and thus have little access to civilized society. Your freedom can just as easily be stolen by the clever lawcrat classes, and such theft is becoming ever easier as they dumb-down, mal-educate and sloganize the producer classes that they harvest for their own parasatic benefit. The last thing they want is an informed public.