c 2003 James Bauhaus

                                  POB 220-88367

                                  Hominy, Ok 74035

JUROR GROUPIES

One would not normally expect such people to exist, but they do,

and they are abundant. Defense-biased groupies are almost

totally-excluded due to their unwillingness to abide the lairs of

authority or their having previously been branded criminals. The lawyer's system permits none of its victims to function a jurors. Thus by far most juror groupies are biased toward conviction.

Their bias comes from previous victimization by thieves or bullies,

or from police or authority worship, gov't/media indoctrination,

TV/Hollywood propaganda, the allure of power over the helpless, or

sheer malice, among other things. Even petty acts of vandalism can

spark a desire for generalized revenge, as have domestic altercations

and mere verbal abuse toward the meek.

Juror groupies are often old, small, weak and timid, but can be

large, sly, fast-talking, young and strong just as easily. Prosecutors,

Judges and the juror selection process tends to exclude the young and

shiftless in favor of the older, affluent property owner who has no

thing better to do than sit on juries. Consequently, juror groupies

selected for the pool of draftees tend to be older, predominantly fe

male, white, and moderately affluent.

The second part of the selection process is where they enjoy the

game of learning the selection process, choosing which trial they want

to be in on, then sneaking past the defense lawyers to torpedo and sink

the fortunes of their selected target. Human nature being complex and

courtroom time limited, there is no way to assess who of the jury

pool are sleepers and moles with any accuracy. Assume they all are.

In my own experience, one juror groupie stands out above the rest

of the vile, dishonest varlots who feign honesty, fairness and

objectivity they plot your enslavement death. He was old and had many

possessions to protect, which goes far to explain his grudge against

strangers accused of crime by his protectors. Old people are often

bitter about being old and weak and having to take abuse from the young

instead of giving it. They often are bitter about having wasted so

much of their lives now that they have so little left. They are

miserable and spreading misery gives them a warm feeling of accomplishment.

    This one was able to crawl aboard my jury for two reasons: he did

not have to look me in the eye and lie to me personally because the

public defender (PD) lawyer blocked my view and bogarted the selection

process. Even so, the lawyer they saddled me with was suspicious. He

asked me, "What about that guy? You want to get rid of him?" Me being an ignorant, gullible, inexperienced teenaged kid, I did the exact

wrong thing and bowed to this lawyer's superior knowledge and

experience at jury selection. I asked him, "You've picked more juries thanI have. What do you think?" Him being an oily lawcrat intent on maintaining the secrets of courtroom rituals, answered with the non-answer,"It's your choice." Definitely I should have insisted he give a proper answer. Or I should have realized he was hinting something andjust got rid of the guy. As you've probably guessed by now, I'm not too intelligent when it comes to correctly solving time-limited socialequasions. Worse that a typical male, social problems are often too  subtle for me to even detect, much less deduce their solution.

A normal kid would probably simply thought, "Dirt knows dirt," but at the time I didn't know both the juror and the lawyer were dirt. But I had been reading "The status seekers" that recommended professional people for jurors. This undercover weasel was a geologist, the only true professional on the jury so far (and thus supposedly more intelligent and open minded.)

    This I told to the PD, adding, "So, unless you have reason to

believe this guy is biased, I'd rather keep him."

The lawyer merely repeated the key words "keep him" and promptly

moved on (to ignoring me), keeping secret his reason for suspecting

this geologist to be the dirt he turned out to be. (Lawcrats routinely

and frequently screw their "clients" by omission They justify this by

calling it their "work product". E.G. the audience paid to see the

show; the price of admission did not pay for any explanation on how

the magician's tricks work.)

    In short, the PD was worse than worthless, he was actually

harmful for many reasons. He blocked my access to the jury, gave bad advice, concealed information about the law and courtroom ritual that it was vital for me to know, he even was zonked out of his sober mind on some type of tranquilizer for all but one day of the trial process, to name only his primary faults.

    This juror led the howling pack of emotionally inflamed jurors to convict me upon nothing more than the lies of two witnesses. When this gang of thirteen returned to puke their life sentence upon this innocent author, the sleazy geologist's wrinkled face exploded into a wide, lip-splitting grin and silent guffaws of pleasure that he took pains to make certain I saw. He didn't have the courage to actually bray out loud like a mule, fearing the judge's censure, but he did flap

his arms and spasm his shoulders as he tried to get my attention as the jurors filed out. The PD saw him do this, as did the judge and prosecutor. Soon as I pointed him out, he instantly sobered. Neither the PD or the judge would comment on this or acknowledge his malicious and biased behavior. A female juror smirked at his getting caught at it, a black juror looked embarrassed, the others pretended notto have expected or seen this.

    Another juror groupie managed to slither onto my jury. He was a short, endomorphic reporter for a local news-radio station, KRMG, still in business. He chose to smoothly lie his way into position at my trial due to its notoriety. The mediawhores had been periodically selling lurid and grisly descriptions and anonymous police fabrications about the case for over twenty months. This guy wanted the inside scoop, and he got it. During each of the many recesses the judge and prosecution called, he'd sneak into the courthouse's "media room" and report to KRMG as the trial progressed! This is flagrantly illegal, and despite the judge's worthless and hollow yet gruff and solemn admonishments to the jurors not to do this, hedid anyway. I did not even know there was a room that the judges set aside for theexclusive use of the newshookers. After the trial was over and it was too late, the

PD told me what this bastard had done. The lawyer used this as his method of easing on out safely on a hopeful note. He genuinely felt bad about an innocent teenager getting his life taken away through fraud, perjury, trickery and evidence theft,but not enough to fix it. He said, "We can appeal on this!" I was too stupid torealize then that "we" could have had a mistrial, since he was caught in the act of exiting their media room. His radio station's newscaster had let slip the fact that their reporter was actually on the jury.

(Commenting during trial!)

Since radio waves leave no hard copy, the judges simply said "no proof" so it didn't happen, at least in their minds. The prosecutor and judge could not have been unaware of their well-known, long-time courtroom correspondent's antics. Courtcrats take pains to know all the media personnel very well in order to maintain good relations and dodge inadvertent fiascos such as happened to certain politicians recently caught in the act of being themselves (Reagan, Rochefeller, Bush, Lot, etc.)

    The prosecutors, judges and other courtcrew know all about juror groupies, yet remain silent because they are their secret conviction-clinchers. This is one way they are able to get such obscene conviction rates of 99% or so. Defendants and ordinary people can not spot them. They try never to give the prosecutor or judge any

high-signs while the victim is watching. If such seems about to occur, the prosecutor, judge, bailiff, court reporter or cops will warn them off with a glower and quick nay-shake of the head. Sometimes the groupies can be spotted by their characteristics. Subterfuge is helpful too, if possible.

    Juror groupies often seek approval from authority figures. This type will be seen seeking the attention of the cops, bailiffs and others of the courtcrew. Manywill position themselves to accost the prosecutor and judge. This is why judges have back doors, or at least one reason. To the juror groupie, this is the equivalent of cornering Kirk or Spock at a star trek convention. Many juror groupies are not out for praise, but for a generalized revenge against enemies of the gov/media's never-ending, always-on-the-news "war on crime". Such people are indistinguishable from normal persons except in degree of zealousness.

    This is where subterfuge is used to draw them out. During jury selection it is wise to have family and friends mix with these people and feign empathy for the prosecution while concealing their relationship to the targeted accusee. Zealotsand bigots can not resist boasting of their previous or planned derailments of thejustice process if given slight encouragement. Jurors are treated like cattle by

the judge and courtcrew and usually form an unwatched mob standing in corridorsawaiting orders from loitering cops or bailiffs. Secreting oneself among them is easy, usually, and while pretending to be one, observation can reveal much. Juror pools are usually herded from trial to trial until they are used up. Note the ones who appear to enjoy the process. The juror pool is let to watch and hear the lawcrats grill each candidate. Instead of being manipulated by the lawcrats, they

quickly learn how simplistically easy it is for them to manipulate the system itself. Beware the ones who appear to be adjusting their responses to seek particular trials. Usually a wink and a smile is enough encouragement to cause an ordinary juror groupie to reveal his or her plan.

    One last point should be made. Never underestimate the numbers of authorityworshiping juror groupies. It is due to their multitudes that many courthouse lawcrats are able to propel themselves into high(er) political office. Prosecutorsand judges glad-hand amongst a steady stream of jurors year after year. Such familiarity creates strong voting blocks. A grinning face, name recognition, a warm handshake and a few kind words to thousands of such approval and praise seekers has been the beginning of many a lucrative career in politic s.

 Judges and Prosecutors know this. The ambitious ones are always building toward such ends and cultivate jurors precisely for this purpose. A side benefit of this little-known, unstudied process is an improbable conviction rate that includes a large percentage of the completely innocent. The latest, most accurate studies indicate the number of innocents convicted ranges from 7 to 15% easily.