LAWYERS=CRIMINALS: PROOF ONE

We will never achieve an equitable society as long as we continue to let our politicians' "credentials" be University-level rhetoric and a fifth-grade understanding of science.

The easiest-to-find, clearest to see proof that lawyers equal barely disguised criminals is to examine who grants, and who can take away, their license to enjoy the tremendous river of lucre that the "practice" of law never fails to bring to them. Lawyers get to rake in tons of cash and property from their woefully ignorant "Clients" only so long as they have the approval of their more senior, entrenched fellows and the judges to whom they bring their cases, (the "Bar" associaton and "Cheif Judges of the supreme Courts").

This sounds perfectly innocent until you think about it, and their boasts of having, somehow, an "adversarial" system. Take the worst case scenario, which is proven, through DNA evidence, to occur a minimum of seven of every 100 trials-the false conviction of innocent citizens sentenced to death and often executed. (1) Now, notice that this is not a new phenomenon, that just started occurring recently. It merely appears so because only since 1987 have citizen-victims begun sometimes succeeding in forcing judges to accept scientifically irrefutable DNA proof of innocence over the carefully choreographed courtroom theatrical performances of the cops, prosecutors, judges, bailiffs, public defenders, court reporters, media hacks, etc. In actual fact, it is obvious that lawyers (and cops) have worked together for cenyturies, using their self given privilege of govt approved murder, to execute their percieved foes. The fact of the powerful executing the weak is old; new is the technology with which they are caught at it. Previously they could use their art of rhetoric and wordsmithy to lie and connive their crimes onto others or onto no one. Now they occasionally face irrefutable proof that can be shownto others or added to other proof of crimes past, establishing patterns of official criminal behavior. No matter how many times they are caught practicing fraud in court at trial to obtain false convictions, they still follow their old ways. They deny their crimes, even in the face of irrefutable proof, or minimize the crime, or otherwise use their grand art of manipulatimnve verbosity to dupe the sleepy or overemotional majority into letting them continue their sordid despicable acts of abduction, false imprisonment, torture and murder unhindered.

Now picture yourself as the soon to be executed, convicted by lies and fraud innocent. Pretend also that you are affluent enough to have found and employed that mythical beast, an honest, ethical defense lawyer. Let us further believe that he believes you are innocent and that the system he works for is honest. There is only one snag-unlike the 230 plus DNA-proven fraudulently convicted innocents, you are one of the many thousands of citizens who were unable to get the irrefutable DNA proof of your innocence out of cop-prosecutor evidence vaults. All it takes to have your life stolen forever by the constantly overhyped American criminal court/prison system is ONE ignorant, gullible, malicious or paid or threatened buffoon to point their finger at you, and some grave, solemn/stern yip-yap from a sleazy, glory-grabbing prosecutor-judge team. This idiotic "standard" is boastfully called by those who get rich off it "proof (of guilt) beyond a reasonable doubt". (Fact: the American criminal lawyers' system is so extremely corrupt now that it must be constantly and massively propped up by Hollywood/TV propaganda and corporate "news" (infotainment) productions) Without continual re-indoctrination with the nonsense that American lawyers are better than any other lawyers, otherwise alert, intelligent citizens would awaken from our civic-duty comas and evaluate the facts instead of the cunningly produced courtroom propaganda efforts.

This actually occurred many times throughout history, most notably during the French revolution, at great cost to royalty and their legal and bureaucratic henchmen.)

This "reasonable doubt" standard was forced into law by the victims of centuries of governmental oppression after finally bringing the corrupt and super-privileged to justice. Even before the corpses cooled after each revolution, the survivors formed neo-corrupt groups, plotting to snatch for themselves the govt positions of power, riches and opportunity : vacated by the dead and fleeing- As always occurs, the advancing layer of elitists began immediately chiseling away at all the human rights forced upon them by the ignorant working/producing hordes. Ps occurs in all societies, the scum waste no time in raising themselves to the top, since power corrupts, the mal-educated can't rule and the middle class is so easily exploited. The elite, hereditary-rich opportunists here in America have been at this for 232 years now.(2) As a consequence, "reasonable doubt" now exists as nothing more than warm, moist fumes blowing from an appeals judge's mouth as he assures innocents that they enjoyed every one of our abundance of rights before being locked away forever or being murdered by lethal injection.

This is what strangles freedom and justice so; the fact that these clever, fiendish, "patriotic" elites have fine-tuned their societal machinery to such a high degree that the people whom the feed upon so robustly remain comatose while losing our life blood; that

they have made a magnificent edifice of pretend-education that awards honors for mediocrity and guile rather than invention and accomplishment; that they can so easily paralyse the few educated, alert citizens with endless bureaucratic form-filling and debate, and; when finally some few survivors are able to muster, like me, (3) irrefutable proof of our innocence and their corruption, they can simply declare it does not exist and never answer for their crimes of stealing evidence, lying about it, refusing facts, switching the law and dodging justice, etc.

A prime example is my case, where a string of crooked judges, particularly one named Sven Eric Holmes, agreed with him when he declared that the physical laws of hair growth do not apply in his courtroom.(5) After practicing decades of courtroom corruption in Tulsa, OK, his actions finally made his seat on the "federal" bench too warm, forcing him, like a turtle, to seek the shade of a corporate partnership (to sell his influence for their financial/legal survival) He could easily have stayed and continued to dispense denials of justice and other courtroom corruptions until he died, but each dishonest ruling adds to the hordes of the wronged, and this becomes harder to make the citizens quietly swallow. Judge Holmes, and his fellow cronies-at-law, are like the Native American conception of the lizards named Gila Monsters- They are thought to defecate into their tails, eventually to explode in a violent spray of evil-smelling feces. Judge Holmes had maximized his pension, hence there was no real reason for him to continue to soil that particular area with his stench-For the good of his "profession" it was decided by his fellow elites that this was a good time for him to move on, rather than contribute further to the critical mass that might cause his fellows to explode too. (See: Faces of Corruption: Judge Jesse Harris). For this reason it is common practice for govts to rotate its most corrupt and publicly hated practitioners out of sight and into new areas before they generate too much public ire against them and their system.

At every measure, the profession of lawyer equals crook, simply because unsupervised power inevitably corrupts, and because nothing that lawyers produce is, or can be, objectively measured. The profession of lawyer deliberately races away from any means of honest measurement. Lawyering has nothing to do with science, and everything to do with exploiting gullibility and creating doubt and confusion in others. As it stands, and HAS stood for centuries, the privileged who interpret law have not progressed one inch beyond the realm of thug versus victim. The only difference is that the lawyer-thugs steal from us all much more valuable things than mere property- And these thugs at law will continue to eat us alive until we begin the revolution that forces real science into their dark, sleazy chambers and courtrooms- Outside supervision and in-daylight quality control are the only things that will solve this crisis of casual corruption and force real progress in this most corrupt, most destructive and harmful of opportunist-driven vocations.

(1) See: "Death Penalty Study of Columbia University" on www.jamesbauhaus.org and Scientific American, 12-1998 p. 31

(2) "Innocent's Guide to Avoiding False Conviction","How Politicians Juke Justice" and "Stealth Rights Robbery"

(3) "How Police Screw Scientific Evidence", "PCR" and "Eyewitness This!" (4) "En Banc", "Rule 60 B", "and "Mandamus"

(5) "Order" by Judge Sven Eric Holmes, filed 3-31-1998, Case # 96-cv-929-h