HOW PRISONCRATS AND LAWCRATS INCREASE CRIME

The major and obvious causes of crime are youthful ignorance, economic disparity, laziness, addiction to pleasure, lack of having been disciplined, lack of knowledge/vision and contempt for rich, old, white-biased American culture.

Almost all of these causes of crime are connected to simple learning and proper administration of positive and negative reinforcement: Scholastic achievement for minorities is low because they are allowed to scheme their way out of school knowing very little. Ghetto slang overcomes what literacy they were taught, and no one wishes to hire persons who can't speak, spell, write or calculate accurately or correctly. Youths who can't earn a living wage turn increasingly to the pleasure of high-priced drugs and afford them by selling them to friends, peers and strangers. This spreads the misery and allows cops and lawcrats to demand ever-larger taxpayer subsidies for them to chase drug money, drugs and prison/lawyer's system tax-prof its.

While the forces of law-making and enslavement enrich themselves mightily through intensive tax-harvestment and asset-theft, millions of drug-slaves are put to work filling cages for further charges against the taxherd, always with the same threat; i.e. pay more taxes or we will turn loose hundreds of criminals.

 One of the biggest lies they perpetrate is their calling themselves "corrections" departments. If govcrats had to obey their own truth in advertising laws, these slow-deathcamp administrators would head Departments of Wily Torture and Harassment, or-of Revenge and Suffering, or of Enforced Idleness and Sensory Deprivation, or of Criminal Enhancement and Violence Training.

When the cop, lawcrat and media machines make their taxherd salivate at their bestowing of their label 'criminal', warehousing of slaves results along with fabulous treasure-troves of tax-subsidies for convict-hating cops, guards and lawcrats.

Almost none of these tax-harvesting enterprises are applied to programs that have a chance of lessening crime. E.g. prisoners need education more than any other thing. This they do not get. Ninety-nine percent of prisoner's time is spent in almost total lack of any educational enterprise. Convict-hater prison crats actively prevent or diminish every form of higher education through many different tactics. Mail is simply stolen: the prison crats have simply given themselves a law that permits them to steal all catalogues, junk mail and any other kind of mail they wish to perceive as threatening or unsolicited. This means correspondence courses are virtually impossible because of 'lost' mail. Mail-room guards obtain orgasmic pleasure from stealing or returning mail that contains cards or laminates thicker than paper by dreaming that it somehow conceals drugs. Their common tactic is to return or steal without notice an entire school package because a teacher enclosed his business card. This same thing happens when any packet contains a stick-on label. Prisoncrats will not explain what it is that they perceive as threatening in a stick-on label, but all judges agree with whatever their excuse is. Polaroid pictures, CDs, and most physical sciences such as physics, chemistry and biochemistry are likewise verboten. Anywhere any priscrat can hallucinate a drug, bomb, poison or sharp, pointy or blunt object, it is not getting past their mail-theft room. Try to order any type of information from prison. You will not be receiving any business literature on anything, not even stock/iommodity investments, internet startups, electronics innovations, managerial programs or even votech training, Ordering books is an agony, too. Almost always there is some reason your books must be sent back, 'donated' to some guard charity or otherwise blockaded from entry. A hard cover book is a weapon, a history book is subversive, magazines are regularly stolen. Mailroom guards all take what they want of Playboy, Newsweek, Consumer Reports, Cycle, Car and Driver, even Scientific American, a magazine none of them have any possible use for. They are always careful to spread out their thefts so as not to prey too heavily on one prisoner, lest he get disgusted and simply cancel all his subscriptions. What would these scummy guards do then? They certainly are not going to buy their own subscriptions. Everything is delayed so they can read, photocopy and snoop through every letter and package. No guard home is not full of prisoner's magazines as well as other property. Most have prisoner's fans, TVs. radios, calculators, extension cords, hotpots, etc. Anything we can buy from them, they steal from us.

Priscrats act like they teach GED classes, but these are always only token attempts that teach a very few persons very little at the very end of their enslavement term. Television is pinched off by jealous guards, cops and lawcrats. Only high-priced colorremote sets are sold at 150% markup. This ensures that the fewest will afford them. Periodically priscrats lobby the lawcrats for legislation that pinches off the number and quality of programing channels. The legislators are always happy to agree. Guards shut down, then steal prisoner's self-help programs such as Jaycees, Toastmasters, scared straight, marathons for abused and crippled children, even the popcorn and camera concession. Every time a prisoner wants a picture to send his Mother and family, he must pay a guards' slush-fund to do so. Every time he gets sick, he pays the priscrats. No jobs are allowed or jobs are minimized. If he can get a job, the pay is tiny and most of that is sucked back off immediately by guards, medics, judges and other fee-ocracies.

By always pickpocketing the prisoners and their families, and by always having a concerted policy of prevention of education as they feign education, the govcrats of every stripe combine to make absolutely certain that their prisoners who do eventually leave the tortureholes will always quickly return with even more of their lives to be spent in taxsubsidized sensory deprivation. This tactic ensures job security for burgeoning hordes of cop, guard, lawyer and govcrat families. Also, since the taxherd hasn't yet snapped to this "keep 'em distracted from the real problem with ever-increasing crime" strategy in the past 80 years, it is not likely that they will learn it in the NEXT 80 years. The politics of failure win and keep on winning due to ignorance of it from both the physically enslaved and the economically enslaved.

D.A.R.E. TO THINK!

8-3-99: The NBC Morning show host Ms Curry moderated an emotion-packed debate between the University of Kentucky's Dick Clayton and the top bureaucrat in charge of maintaining the tax-cash flow to the cop's anti-drug program D.A.R.E. Glen Levant is the DARE representative. DARE is an acronym for "Drug Abuse Resistance Education".         '

DARE is the winning bureaucracy that beat out, took over, stole and monopolized all citizen's (meaning "politician's") efforts (meaning fed govt subsidies) to teach drug = bad to children too young to know how to think. Down the DARE maw went scared straight and numerous other competing anti-drug programs of citizen's groups like those of Churches, Jaycees, Toastmasters, YMCA, YWCA, etc. Thanks to the cop's lobby, cops have ripped off all citizenal anti-drug programs, put them in DARE and used it as their tool for sucking up all available federal and state anti-drug taxcash.

Clayton began by citing his University of Kentucky study that used control groups and other scientific methods to discover what "...7 to 10 other studies..." already proved; that DARE is completely ineffective. They all found no difference in drug use by controls versus DARE-targeted children and even found that the cops' "sleeper-effect" excuse to be bogus. (Long known to be ineffective, DARE's cop-lobby invented a theory that children spontaneously become drug-resistant after studies proving DARE's ineffectiveness ended. The cop-lobby's legislative pals accepted this nonsense and continued to push mountains of our tax cash into the DARE shell at cops so that they can continue to send deserving PR cops on junkets to program unsuspecting schoolchildren.)

Levant, crazed with emotion, interrupted Clayton, calling Clayton's contentions untrue and began claiming that Kentucky University's study flawed with standard rhetoric-school discrediting technique:

1.      The UK study only scrutinized a small fraction of the cops' DARE program: somehow "80%" of DARE eluded the study.

2.      The UK study only scrutinized the "old" DARE program. Somehow there is a "new" DARE program and it wasn't studied.

3.      The UK study somehow only studied "elementary school children" for a "short term".

4.      The UK study was somehow flawed by also scrutinizing some unspecified "other" anti-drug programs that Levant apparently thinks counteracted his DARE programs.

5. Some un-named, unspecified study done in neighboring Ohio by unspecified other researchers found DARE to be completely effective.

Clayton calmly disputed each of these points with logic and by specifying the actual parameters of his UK study. Levant responded with more rhetoric so hotly that Ms. Curry twice shouted him to civility.

The conclusion of both at the end of the debate was that this many times proven-ineffective program should be continued, Clayton believing that it should be somehow improved.

Thus a huge, useless tax-cash-sucking money-pit continues to benefit a few cops merely because it has the magic anti-drug label and is supported by a few anonymous congresspersons. Here again a bureaucratic tax-vacuum has taken on a life of its own. Now its function is to survive and grow larger like a cancer. It puts out a few cheap pamphlets and is merely an organ for passing out travel and seminar perks to a few carefully-chosen public relations cop-crats.

COPS AND JAIL-RATS FRAME GOOD SAMARATAN

In 1983 Ellen Reasonover called the cops on a gas station robbery-murder. The killers were long gone. Cops had no description, no car, no witnesses, nothing but a corpse. Because of constant media harping about crime, especially unsolvable murders, cops knew that they had to crucify some-BODY. Following their no longer quite so secret-cop-policy of "first smeller's the feller", they quickly clapped their suckers onto the one person who was stupid enough to report a crime and stick around to "help" police by reciting into their faces several times the exact, same facts she'd already told their dispatcher on the phone: "All I know is that there is a corpse in the gas station". (In creating their nation of gullible snitches to do their work for them for free, cops tell their phone-monkeys to pull every trick they know to connive the good Samaritans into revealing their identities and into foolishly sticking around until the cops can nail them in person.)

The crooked cops quickly hid and destroyed all the innocence-pointing evidence, as is their standard practice. Next, they created `evidence' that `proved' that Ms Reasonover was the killer, also with standard cop techniques. They did this by several means, the first of which involves the crooked cops agreeing among themselves to nail her. The second step is planting the evidence. Having decades of practice, most cops pull what they call the "cross-plant". This means that they plant stuff from the crime scene on their chosen victim, and they plant DNA, hair or clothing fibers, etc from their victim or his possessions onto the crime scene. Cops prefer their crossplant method because it never fails to trick a set of jurors every time.

Besides putting the cross on their target/victims, cops also back it up by creating eyewitnesses. They first create eyewitnesses by showing the honest cops, (if any) the evidence they've planted. This way they duck around any honest supervisors they might have: the honest cops who have little or no history of lying, cheating, stealing, planting, etc, in their secret police records are then told to write out their reports and submit them to their supervisor. (Generally only crooked cops are promoted to supervisory positions; especially those who are most successful at concealing their criminality.)

Next, cops create eyewitnesses by snatching up everyone in the vicinity. This is why cops always block roads and prevent any independent witnesses from watching their antics: convictions depend upon cops both controlling-creating their own witnesses and preventing the creation/discovery of potential defense witnesses.   

Cops arrest and corner everyone within a huge radius of the crime scene. They take information first, then, depending on circumstances, begin planting information that they want into the heads of the eager, willing and gullible persons that they choose as conviction witnesses.

Anyone who doesn't eagerly and enthusiastically do exactly as the cops say is automatically targeted as a potential "convictim". This way the cops cut the herd into two groups: copsuckers and convictims. In the case of Ellen Reasonover, the cops found no one near to create an eyewitness of, so they decided to suppliment their cross-plants with another brand of often-used sure-fire conviction technique: jailrats.

Cops have thousands, no, millions of cages stuffed full of relatively short-termed victims who will sell their mothers to the Devil for just a promise of a day off their sentences. They're in cop-constructed tortureholes and fried every two hours by badge-wearing Demonspawn. No cameras or recorders ever see what really goes on in cops' jails, but you can guess by how many "suicides" cops claim occurred, and by realizing that the badged Volpos who anally, then orally, raped Abner Louima with their nightsticks, ripping out his rectum and then breaking his teeth to make him eat his own feces, are everywhere inside cops' jails. Louima is just the one guy in fifty years who accidentally survived and had a doctor snitch off the pigs who did it to him.

The cops stuffed Ms Reasonover into one of these cages, then moved her to another cage, then told the two they selected to be rats that they could get time off by spewing a cop-concocted story of Ms Reasonover's "confession" to them in jail at the jurors. The two rats that the cops had selected were experts at copsucking, and both have long histories of being cops' snitches. The cops told them exactly what to say, and they parroted it to the jurors. The jurors licked it up, not in small part because of the clever cops making sure that each rat "heard" different 'confessions" by Reasonover at different times in separated cages, and didn't know each other. (Various courtroom tricks are employed to make certain that neither rat sees or discovers the existence of the other, ever, or at least until after conviction is created. This keeps these not-to-bright persons from screwing up the cops' carefully laid plans as often has happened in the past.) Generally two 'separate' rats putting the same 'confession' in the victim's mouth is plenty enough to make the jurors gleefully stampede over one another toward conviction. Usually at least one cop will also put a confession in his victim's mouth too, lying straight- facedly into the juror's eyes with no problem.

This practice of having at least one cop confirm their two jail-rat's stories makes the jurors lick up this vomit instantly. With zero amount of evidence besides these three liars pointing their fingers like sawed-off shotguns, the 13 jurors promptly, easily and voluntarily allowed the cops and courtcrats to dupe them with a minimum of effort. Usually the mere perception of honesty that cops and courtcrats give themselves in the media and courtrooms is enough to make jurors slap their guilty buttons without any actual thought. Jurors show up because they want to convict someone. Persons with independent thought processes are not conned into juror duty very often.

The cops are all carefully trained in how to maintain plausible deniability at all times. This goes double for the prosecutors, judges, their bailiffs and the "public Defenders". Not that it matters much: every crooked cop, dishonest judge, scurrilous prosecutor, even lying citizen witnesses are completely immune to any and all lawsuits no matter how corrupt they are discovered to be later. Special laws protect every govt employee of every kind, especially civilian liars upon the witness stand for the prosecution. Any and all govt crooks, from cop to judge to congressperson who get caught in the act of criminality too many times is always allowed to merely resign instead of get fired. This is the way their cronies permit them to escape across political boundaries with their lucrative govt pensions and perks intact: a reward for their years of successful corruption before finally getting caught too many times for citizens to suffer any further. Real punishment does not occur.

The only real reason crooked cops and other govt employed criminals hide their corruption is because getting caught too many times too often wrecks their carefully cultivated illusion of professional respectability. Cops and lawyers have unions that employ full time public relations teams to make absolutely certain that everything said about them on TV, radio or in print is carefully sanitized and cleansed of any derogatory comment. Special quasi-secret govt-concocted "self"-censorship "guidelines" (requirements) are issued to every media outlet, even the motion picture associations and magazine editors. This way no talking head ever says, "The police chased a traffic violator into a school bus, killing 75 kindergarten children". Instead they are instructed to always lay the implication of blame elsewhere, thus; "Joe Multiple Lawbreaker, led police on a high speed chase..."

Ms Reasonover was enslaved for life without parole, in the cops' most scummy, filth-encrusted, darkest dungeons. Because cop and court criminals are so clever in isolating their victims from society, the mere label `criminal' is usually sufficient to even turn your family against you. This is partly why it took her SIXTEEN YEARS to flip the rock on these soul-less maggots.   The primary reason they were able to hide their crimes so long is because it is almost impossible to obtain the pigs' secret files where they conceal their corruptions.

The freedom of information act is a toothless law that does not affect cops in any way unless they want it to. Consequently no one can get any cop files until long after all the corrupt cops have scattered to the winds and were able to erase their dirty deeds from the records before leaving. Then a victim is forced to buy a lawyer and kiss every lawcrat's ass for miles at top speed forever.

Even so, eventually Ms Reasonover was able to expose enough cop and prosecutor evidence theft and corruption that finally a wing-eared judge could no longer deny it. The three lawyers it took to pry the croaks off her have taught her not to curse the system that stole the best years of her life and are now exhibiting her as evidence that the lawyer's system works!

How sweet a system have these Gluttons Of Privilege created that makes their slimiest corruptions appear to be proof that they are the purest of angels?

It doesn't get any better than this!