8-1-07

Senator Coburn                                                                                   James Bauhaus

Senate Office Bldg.                                                                            LCF 88367

Washinhton, DC                                                                                 8607 Flowermound rd

                                                                                                             Lawton, OK 73

Dear Senator Coburn,

Thanks for speaking up for those poor border patrol guards whose jurors were not allowed to hear all the facts, especially those about their service records. I can easily empathize with them, because even worse happened to me. The Police and Prosecutors STOLE the DNA and fingerprints that would have caught the actual killer. This and worse is detailed on my netsite, www.jamesbauhaus.org (4bauhaus(at)quik.com). In my last three appeals, where I STILL can't get an honest ruling I disproved everybit of the convicting evidence (merely two fingerpointers) AND un covered massive evidence theft, perjury and the prosecutor lying about it to jurors to cover it up.

When the authorities can simply steal your life with nothing but two liars, then the whole system is rotten. When you can prove your innocence and they still disregard their own laws, con stitution and precedent, and STILL affirm this abortion of justice, the personnel running the system is more than just rotten. (Please see "Lawswindled for Life!" on my site for bibliographic proof that their "mistakes" are often deliberate and that their accuracy rate is abysmal.)

This country imprisons at least 330,000 innocents now, and 105,000 MORE innocents are falsely imprisoned EVERY YEAR.

For each of us falsely imprisoned, there is a criminal who gets away AND is ENCOURAGED to commit more, worse crimes in the immediate future.

When the connected and influential are allowed to dodge out of the appeals system and shortcut to pardon/commutation, then they are snared by the ever more harsh "GET TOUGH ON CRIME! laws, the appeals system is apparently too unwieldy to do anyone any good. Please help get these little-people's cases fixed, and the system fixed, because the more it looks like we have elite and poor law systems, the more we will be disrespected.

Here's for a more just system.

Thank you for your time, and for listening, and for any assistance you may provide.

Sincerely,

James Bauhaus

Sen. Brad Henry                                                                                 James Bauhaus

Chair: Judiciary Corn.                                                                                    POB 220-88367

4419 N. Bryan                                                                                                Hominy, Ok 74035

Shawnee, OK 74801

Dear Senator Henry,

Does your committee exercise quality control on courts? The Council on Judicial Complaints doesn't.           (See: COC-00-114 through 118 by Eric Mitts, 877 873 7468)          I hope you do, because OCCA reversed its ruling in my case (Bauhaus v Ok cr ap 532 p2d 454 (1975)) to cut Hunt's sentence 2/3rds solely due to the same improper remark that occurred at my trial. OCCA simply "declines" to follow their own precedent. (See: Hunt v Ok cr ap 601 p2d 470 (1979)) in which OCCA ruled "Such is the same as mentioning a robbery case during a murder trial, and can not be allowed."

I re-appealed as soon as I found their reversal of opinion. After 20 months and 4 lawsuits in 3 courts, OCCA finally issued HC-00-962 (enclosed) in which they simply ignore the sole contention and refuse to rule.

Thus OCCA provides special treatment to Hunt, and extra punishment to me. At minimum the they demonstrate partiality.

I am completely innocent and have for 28 years tried to track down the actual culprit. I would relish any help or suggestions you provide. I also have proof of my own innocence in signed police reports and a newspaper picture that recently came to light due to my search. I returned to prison to clear my name and was denied an escape trial to prevent me from using it to display my facts to the jury. Then at appeal 38 judges in 8 courts have chosen to protect the killer instead of uphold the law.

I would greatly appreciate any help you can provide.

Sincerely,

                         James Bauhaus