TRICKLE DOWN JUSTICE: HOW TO GET SOME!

4-1-09: One of the most outrageous jailbreaks of justice occurred today. Every alert person knew that it was going to occur; we just did not know how or when. The criminals' choice of April Fool's day to announce it shows the culprits' extreme arrogance toward U.S. citizens. What was it? It was US Attorney General Eric Holder's announcement that he was"dropping charges" against already convicted Alaska Senator Ted Stevens. You remember Stevens: he spent 40 years clawing his way up the political ladder to gain control of the top of the US taxpayers' money volcano. (senate appropriations committee chairman), demonstrating himself to be the most cunning of all legislators since that 100 year old klansman.

Strom Thurman, finally croaked. Steven's career was passing out our money to his brethren legislators and collecting obscene amounts from our labor and technology. Only recently did he lose influence enough for his greed to be prosecuted. (he 'forgot' to pay $250.000 when a construction company to which he'd steered govt contracts returned the favor by jacking up his extra hunting lodge/ski chalet and putting a new storey under it).

Stevens got caught 90 years too late, but nonetheless got caught fair and square enough for 12 jurors to see this and "convict" him of some mealy-mouthed "crimes" that some prosecutor did not really want to win. He never went to jail, as lesser criminals always do. Instead, he continued to vote on legislation even though he is a convicted felon. These were more crimes, but the cops and prosecutors in charge of protecting us from crime decided to go blind to the fact that the legislators strip felons of their right to vote. In fact, their decision to ignore their duty created extra privileges for elite, connected, influential, rich felons that allows them to escape normal behavior, integrity and honesty that they require of us.

On top of this, the self-proclaimed "watchdog" media cowered from commenting on this, which is called "aiding and abetting" crime, since they are the only entity who can influence government crooks to stop engagning in criminal behavior. Judging by how often this occurs, we could conclude that govt and the media are in an alliance against citizens. History shows that govt's inevitably capture the media and uses it to help exploit their tax-herds, right in there with the merchants. Every schoolchild who did not ditch civics class knows that the jury is, by law, the 'final' word on guilt and innocence. The prosecutor can not change his mind after the jury has convicted as the prosecutor wished. Until now!

Attorney General Holder just created new law by simply pulling it out of his ass and announcing it to his foghorn, the media, who dutifully parroted his nonsense to us citizens, without realizing, or caring, what he had done.

Judges who have sense enough to fear the newest crop of altruistic or idealistic law students and the millions of captive litigant-victims of our dishonest lawyer system were quick to call Holder and gasp. "YOU can't do that! Only judges can void juror-given convictions!"

None of the politicians, judges or even prosecutors wanted Stevens to actually suffer conviction or de-election, and every elite was determined to circumvent the jury. Holder simply jumped the gun because he does not yet know how the game of feigning lawfullness in the lawless is played- One of the main troubles with feigning lawfullness among the lawless is the two sets of rules. The rules that you pretend to follow, and make your lackeys follow, are written, albeit extremely confusedly, and displayed where anyone with enough forbearance can eventually read and understand them. The real rules, which only apply to the law lords and members of the superprivileged elite, can never be written. Worse, since they are illegal, the elite can only speak of them amongst themselves, in private. Amongst the truly elite, such as the political and merchant dynasties who arose decades ago and have made positions of power their hereditary property, the rules that apply to them need never be mentioned, they are simply assumed. Every possible privilege that can exist, exists for them. The only prerequisite is discretion. Anything goes, for them, as long as their vices can be contained among they who harbor similar vices, same as drug addicts practice discretion amongst themselves against the cops suddenly bashing their doors in and abducting everyone within, except that there are no cops attacking elites.

Holder was never told the new rules that accrued to him upon appointment . The outsider has to learn the secret rules by trial and error, largely because the elites hope he falls, and because any elite who tells him the rules may get snitched on about these secret rules. (E.G, an honest FBI cop who knew the real rules, and broke them for the good of America, had to conceal his identity from both the people he snitched on and the people he snitched to, for 30 years, in order to dodge retribution. Only this way was he able to live out his life unpunished, revealing his identity only from the safety of his death bed. For this free service and true patriotism, his media dupes angrily named him after a porn film, "Deep Throat".)

Holder should have known to be more subtle when breaking the rules. His actual knowledge of law is suspect when he fails to grasp the min tenet of law school, which states that ESPECIALLY when breaking the law, one must have the appearance of upholding the law. Holder probably thinks he covered this in claiming, without example, that the Steven"s prosecutors "concealed evidence". Apparently we are to presume that Holder's prosecutors concealed evidence of Steven's having paid for the many favors and bribes he accepted. Holder is attempting to secure for Stevens his "Brady v MARYLAND" rights, which were pronounced by a judge, not legislators, when it was found that prosecutors routinely steal evidence favorable to their targets. Specifically, the fraudulently-convicted can, in theory only, become unconvicted if they can prove that prosecutors stole, concealed or destroyed evidence that would cause jurors to change their verdict. In actual practice, this right has so many excuses, requirements, trapdoors, escape hatches and exclusions attached that it is almost impossible for ordinary citizens to access. (E.G, my own case.) Because this "Brady" rule, (not law), is normally reserved as a privilege of the elite or for purchase by the affluent, it is of particular necessity for victims of cop/prosecutor evidence-theft to carefully scrutinize

its use in letting elite escape justice.

Holder's sudden declaration of "dropped charges" is so ridiculous and outrageous that itcaused a secret uproar of judges to "fix" this utter nonsense before people can expose it to the sleepy, ignorant plebs. ("Charges" cease to exist upon conviction: and why pretend to have the quality control of jurors when a mere prosecutor can thwart their work at whim:) Federal judge Emmet Sullivan was chosen to clean up Holder's mess by declaring, out of the blue, Steven's conviction void due to "the worst case of prosecutor misconduct I've seen in all my 25 years as a judge:" (CNN: 4-7-09) (Notice the subtle switcheroo from "withholding favorable evidence" to "prosecutor misconduct", since it certainly did not happen that prosecutors withheld from Stevens proof that Stevens had paid for the bribes.)

Sullivans cleanup is just one more layer of ridiculous nonsense that, if there were any justice, would cause Sullivan's face to be slapped off. He has seen, and PARTICIPATED IN,far worse prosecutor misconduct than this supposed prosecutor concealment of Senator Steven's $250,000-plus in receipts for payment in full of favors and bribes.

Now, when each of these elites get special treatment that takes them above the law, the privilege-giving judge has to devise some sort of plausible-sounding lawyer-reasoning to conceal the fact that this is nothing but cronyism. Whatever he writes as justification must appear to follow the pretend-rules that they use to keep us ordinary citizens in our places. Every time the elites pull this deception, it leaves a crack in the lawyer system that should extend more real rights to ordinary citizens, because the elites have to pretend that their laws give "equal protection" to everyone, as stated in the constitution. (See: "How politicians Juke Justice") Victims of evidence theft should try to get a copy of whatever justifications judge Sullivan wrote and demand it for ourselves under the "equal protection" and "due process" amendments of the US constitution.

Judges know that, every time they create special privilege like this for their temporarily trapped cronies, it causes a stampede of justice-seekers to demand equal justice. This is why judges created the ruse of "unpublished" or "not for publication" opinions, which are flagrant attempts to prevent commoners' access to special privilege "justice" that they "legislate" from their "benches". They try, in this way, to connive you into not even trying to obtain equal protection of the law. When judges can deceive justice-seekers into failing to even ASK for justice because they tell you, falsely, that it is inaccessible because it is "unpublished", they win twice. They win first by lying to you, telling you that they can refuse your constitutionally "guaranteed" right to equal protection of the law merely by marking their decisions "not for publication". If you try to get equal justice with one of their cronies, the judges simply violate the constitution by refusing justice and justifying this judicial crime with the absurd claim that "Senator Steven's caselaw is "unpublished"."

They win a second way when you accept their lie, even for a moment, that their decision is not subject to the equal protection clause and caselaw precedent! If you accept this lie, then study law, and discover it is a lie, then try to obtain equal protection, the judges refuse justice by pretending that there is a time limit on justice, and that you somehow gave up you right to equal protection when you accepted their lie that unpublished decisions somehow trump the US constitution.

Law is sickeningly repulsive in the way it is like children fighting with Pokemon cards. Everything can be trumped by something else. The winner is determined by who is the fastest, slickest or loudest talker. Nothing is fixed or absolute except their power to screw you no matter what, whenever they want, by merely taking their cards and going home. Justice-seekers can only NEVER GIVE UP! Never piss them off by pointing out their flagrant frauds, and study every facet of law, particularly its "tiers and tears". By "tier", I mean which law card trumps what. The"supreme law of the land" is the US constitution. Next cane the state constitutions. Federal law trumps state law, which trumps county law, which trumps city law, which trumps mere "rules" put out by agencies trying to administer real laws. The US supreme court is supposed to trump lower courts, but the circuit court judges routinely refuse to obey supreme court decisions because almost no one can get into supreme court even when we can afford it, since the supreme court refuses to even look at 99% of its justice-seeker's petitions. (This while it ACCEPTS 99% of all cases brought to it by its fellow govcrats, primarily prosecutors trying to get out from under unfavorable rulings.) The circuit court judges are, in practice, the end of the line for ordinary, non-elite justice-seekers. All the courts and judges below circuit level are not much more than an appendage of the lowest paralegal who does the gruntwork of law for the lowliest assistant prosecutor. Whatever he writes goes to the prosecutor-peacocks and is rubberstamped by everyone above, including the judges.

By "tears" I mean when this judicial fabric of yes-men rips in favor of a powerful, rich, connected or influential crony such as Stevens. If it were not for the occasional elite getting stuck in their webs, all of us workers would be eaten by the spiders of law.

Now that 535 politicians have quietly advised the executive branch prosecutors of their extreme displeasure at having one of their cabal targeted, judge Sullivan emphasizes judicial branch agreement with this policy by pronouncing a grand inquisition and possible prosecution of the guilty prosecutors. Just as nothing came of senator Steven's guilt and sentence, nothing will come of the persecution of these prosecutors. The whole process is just a warning, same as gang members doing their finger-jive that means "Two of yours for every one of ours, M'F'!" The three branches of govt all secretly agree to refrain from exposing each other's corruption so that they can concentrate on exploiting the taxherd they share. It was only a fluke that there was a prosecutor-office stupid enough to finally call Stevens on his corruption even after 40 years. This is why the best that ordinary citizens can hope for is that a little sham of justice trickle down to us from on high. Worse news is that we must constantly fight for and demand this little dribble of consideration, else it will dry up faster than sweat on a hot skillet. Everything in law requires this, else the judges whip out their checkered flags and shout, "Time's up! Too slow! You waived your rights!" actively cheating us out of our fair share. This is how the Law Lords work it!