COPCRIME:E

COPCRIME: EVIDENCE STEALING

A major cop activity is stealing evidence that defeats their conviction plans. When Tulsa County Prosecutor Buddy Fallis' porn-snitch was murdered, the hired killer left a trail of his own blood six blocks long. Did the Tulsa cops collect and test this killer's blood? No! Why not? The cops needed this blood for one reason only: to convince a jury that it led them to a witness who saw the killer run by. The cops decided to let the actual killer escape and instead lie an innocent teenager into prison. This way detectives Larry Johnson, Don Bell and Bill McDonald could again dodge brutality convictions. To do this, they had to concoct a plausible excuse for not testing the killer's blood. They got help from Judge Raymond Graham, Prosecutor Jerry Truster and three public defenders. This is how they did it.

They began their scheme by simply lying to the succession of PD's I sent to them to get my half of the blood for testing. Each of these cops claimed the'd collected no blood. All three PD's simply accepted this as if it was normanl for cops to ignore the best evidence there is. (PD's actually prefer their indigent clients get convicted because this curries favor with the judge/DA and thus gets them promoted through the courthouse hierarchy more quickly and more profitably) Because each PD feigned that this was usual cop technique, I assumed it was too, considering their vast experience with cops and my complete lack of dealing with cops or lawyers.

At trial, they concealed all other cops except two: Jesse McCullough and Billy Yarbrough. The judge/DA/PD accomplish this by preventing you from knowing about or seeing the list of witnesses. They draw up this list in a secret session ten days before trial. This is why the courtcrats hate to let you act as your own lawyer. If you are your own lawyer, they have two odious choices: they can let you in on their secret session on who the DA plans to attack you with and what they will say; or, they can plan around you in secret and risk you eventually discovering this illegality and maybe finding an honest appeals judge who will agree.

Both these cops lied their teeth black, claiming two things: that they knew some cop did indeed collect some blood, and that they didn't know who it was or what he did with it. This strategy was calculated to make the jurors think thier evidence theft was merely a "mixup" instead of the incompetence it looked like. Lying by saying "I don't know" is the commonest lie cops, lawyers and politicians employ. It's advantage is twofold: It causes people to guess for ourselves plausible reasons why the cops "don't know", and it saves the cops from uttering further lies, which adds to the risk of getting caught.

The most cunning lie about the blood came from the prosecutor. He timed his lie perfectly, waiting until the last second of his second closing speech. Then he "testified" to the jurors, claiming "insufficient blood was sent to the FBI lab". Truster's lie is fiendishly clever for three reasons: first, he delivered it just before his boss, Judge Graham, conveniently cut off the trial by forcing the jurors into deliberating my fate. This prevented all questions abut this brand new revelation from being asked or answered. The glaring hole in the courtcrew's case against me was thus efficiently patched. Second, by vending his lie as his boss hacked off the trial, Truster was spared having to show any proof to back up his lie. Third, Truster's lie tricked me and the jurors into thinking up plausible lies for ourselves, saving him the risk of uttering them himself. First, we were thus tricked into thinking one cop made one mistake by accidently collecting too little blood. Second, Truster's lie tricked us into thinking the FBI "used up" this little dab of blood trying to test it. Third, Truster's lie duped us into assuming no more blood exists to test.

It took twenty nine years to rip the truth, particle by particle, out of the throats of the cops, prosecutors, judges and public defenders, and still most of it remains concealed. Almost all of the facts had to be stolen out of their records warehouses because each of many appeals judges chose to be blind to all illegalities, lies and evidence thefts. These signed police reports proved that cops McCullough and Yarbrough had themselves collected blood they swore to God they knew nothing about. Other signed police reports proved that cops Lewallen and Donald Peyton and their tame coroner, Dr. Stuart Hinkle had also collected samples of the killer's blood. This makes a minimum of five blood samples taken by forensic experts before they vanished out of police and medical examiner's evidence vaults along with twenty one of the killers fingerprints. The cops, prosecutor and judges also conceal a witness who saw the killer but refused police requests that she change her description of the killer to fit me. The cops and Truster did reveal two eyewitnesses. They caused both to forget their initial descriptions and drawings of the killer and point at me instead. The cops concealed these records too, assuring the two liars that these proofs of their liarhood whould never escape police clutches.

All this signed police report proof of wholesale lying was invisible to 39 judges in 8 courts. But it did momentarily interest 3 civil rights groups. It took them two solid years to pry one more piece of paper out of the cop's hands: the FBI report claiming " insufficient" blood.

Truster's lie was the standard lawyer's lie of simply omitting the essential facts. The crafty cops had collected no fewer than eight blood samples. Seven went to the FBI. At least one went to Hinkle, the coroner, and the cops are still concealing the number of samples they kept for their own lab and how many they sent to the state lab.

Tulsa's top identification bureau cop, Donald Peyton, had sent them to the FBI and he was in charge of ditching these blood samples. Peyton's paper instructing the FBI that all the samples came from the same blood trail is still concealed. It looks like Peyton told the FBI that seven different killers had murdered Mr. Hunt and left seven different blood trials to be analyzed, otherwise they would have put them all together and had too much blood to analyze. All these cops, DA;s, lawyers, judges and FBI agents also want us be believe that five highly trained police forensic experts all made the same incompetent blunder eight times in a row in being too stupid to collect enough of the killer's blood. They had police dogs showing them each blood spot in six blocks. They think we are very gullible.

Because judges give cops and prosecutors blanket permission to steal evidence or hide it forever, innocent accusees can not uncover or guess what these badged, robed or silksuited criminals stole, hid or manufactured. Your are forced to prove a negative proposition, which is a scientifically impossible task. This is the same as proving what lies behind Pluto or under the ocean, except worse because the cops, judges and prosecutors control what is behind Pluto or under the ocean. Soon as you prove your non-guilt, they huddle, then whip out new, improved proof of your guilt specifically concocted to trump your proof. You are forced to operate in total ignorance while the cop/DA/judge team possess infinite ability to nullify anything you can come up with.

There is no way around this. Judges refuse to acknowledge this situation. They will not let you explaing it to the jurors. The jurors will not accept it, no matter how delicately or carefully explained. Even so, you must explain this situation in your opening statement and trroughout trial over the shouts of "Foul!" by the cops and courtcrats.

You have to guess what they stole, hid or manufactured. They manufacture witnesses. They hide paperwork, they steal physical evidence and destroy it as the first appeals judge rubberstamps your conviction. Peyton and Truster destroyed the killer's blood as soon as the FBI sent it back and trial was over. Dr. Hinkle destroyed his sample soon as Larry Johnson asked him to. Not any of these thieving scoundrels will ever suffer even a wristslap for assisting the killer in escaping justice.

After being lied to, lied abut and cheated out of everything that points to the actual criminal, your most effective strategy is to shove past the lawyers and insist the jurors force the cops and prosecutors concealing the evidence. Show your indignation, outrage and frustration. Do not let the courtcrats silence you. Your task is to embarass them into finding the actual killer. Often this entails shouting over the courtcrooks to the jurors. You must be heard if you are to avoid a lifetime of bi-hourly harassment and torture at the hands of this world's most cruel sadists.

Judges can vend no threats that surpass conviction itself. The public defender will try to trick you into silence by selling you the notion of a successful appeal. Never fall for this. Less than half of one percent of convictees ever win appeals. You won't either. Your only hope is the trial. The only quality control on the lawcrats is the jury. You and maybe a juror or two are the only ones who want to find the actual criminal. All the others want nothing but your swift conviction.